Security Quality Assurance

Break it on purpose.
Ship it with proof.

ExploitQA is an independent security assurance practice. I hunt the flaws an attacker would actually use: broken access control, authorization gaps, injection, auth and business-logic bugs. I prove each one by hand, and retest until it's closed.

Manual testing, not scanner noise Every finding verified Free retest to closed
assessment: web & api

Findings summary

scope: app.acme.example
3 findings · ranked by exploitability
CRIT
SQL injection in report export
CWE-89 · CVSS 9.1
Fixed
HIGH
Broken object-level authorization
CWE-639 · GET /api/invoices/{id}
Verified
HIGH
Improper authorization on admin API
CWE-285 · /api/admin/*
Verified
Each issue ships with a reproducible proof-of-concept. retest ready
Assessment coverage
Web applications REST & GraphQL APIs Mobile back ends Cloud & infrastructure Fintech & payments
// the QA in ExploitQA

Security measured like quality, not guessed at.

QA teams don't ship a feature because it compiles. They prove it works. Security deserves the same bar: find the real defect, demonstrate the impact, and confirm the fix holds. That's the whole method.

01

Finding-led, by hand

Scanners catch the obvious and miss the interesting. I test the logic a tool can't reason about: access control, multi-step flows and trust boundaries, and chain small weaknesses into real impact.

02

Proven, not theoretical

No speculative "mediums." Every reported issue comes with a working proof-of-concept and the exact request that triggers it, so your team can reproduce it in minutes.

03

Tracked to closed

Findings move Open → Verified → Fixed on a board you can see. When you've patched, I retest (no extra charge) and sign off only when it's genuinely resolved.

// what I test

The bug classes that actually breach software.

Most real incidents don't come from exotic zero-days. They come from access control and authorization done wrong. That's where I spend the most time, backed by full OWASP coverage.

CWE-639 · CWE-284

Broken access control

IDOR and object-level authorization across tenants and users.

CWE-285 · CWE-862

Improper authorization

Missing function-level checks, privilege escalation, hidden admin APIs.

CWE-287 · JWT

Authentication & sessions

Token forgery, weak secrets, session fixation, reset abuse.

CWE-89 · CWE-78

Injection

SQL, command, SSTI and server-side template and header injection.

Logic

Business & payment logic

Price tampering, race conditions, workflow and ledger abuse.

API Top 10

API security

BOLA, BFLA, mass assignment, excessive data exposure.

CWE-918 · SSRF

Server-side request forgery

Internal pivots, metadata theft, cloud credential exposure.

Config

Secrets & misconfiguration

Leaked keys, permissive CORS, exposed admin and debug surfaces.

// engagements

Pick the depth your release needs.

Scoped to your stack and timeline, from a focused pre-launch check to a full black-and-grey-box assessment of a production system.

most requested

Application & API penetration test

A full manual assessment of your web app and its APIs, authenticated and unauthenticated, across every role, mapped to OWASP and reported with reproducible PoCs.

  • Access control & authorization tested per role, per object
  • Auth, session, injection and business-logic coverage
  • Executive summary plus engineer-ready technical detail
  • Free retest and written sign-off once fixed

API & auth review focused

Deep dive on tokens, sessions and object/function-level authorization across your API surface.

Fintech & payments assurance regulated

Money-movement logic, ledger integrity, KYC and tenant isolation, tested the way an attacker chasing funds would.

Pre-launch security QA pre-ship

A fast, targeted check before a release, with a clear go / no-go on the risks that matter.

// how an engagement runs

A clear path from scope to sign-off.

01

Scope

Targets, roles, rules of engagement and a safe test window, agreed in writing.

02

Map

Recon the attack surface: endpoints, roles, trust boundaries and data flows.

03

Exploit

Manual testing and real exploitation, chaining weaknesses into business impact.

04

Report

Ranked findings, each with a reproducible PoC and concrete remediation.

05

Retest

Confirm every fix, close the board, and sign off on what's resolved.

// the deliverable

A report your team can act on the same day.

  • Risk-ranked findingsSorted by real exploitability and business impact, not raw CVSS alone.
  • Reproducible PoCsThe exact requests, steps and payloads to reproduce each issue.
  • Remediation guidanceSpecific, framework-aware fixes your engineers can apply directly.
  • Retest & attestationA short letter confirming resolved issues, useful for customers and auditors.
// who you're working with

Rahul Joshua

I'm a security engineer who treats offensive testing as a quality discipline. I've run hands-on assessments across fintech platforms and SaaS products, the places where a single broken authorization check moves money or leaks a whole customer base. I work directly with your engineers, keep findings practical, and don't hand over a report I wouldn't want to receive myself.

100%
Manual, verified findings
0
Unproven "maybe" reports
Free
Retest on every engagement
// let's find it first

Know your software holds before someone tests it for you.

Tell me what you're shipping and where you're worried. I'll come back with a scope, a timeline and a fixed price.

rahuljoshua77@gmail.com